My Anti-Scurvy Shirt
Posted by: Steve Jamieson in Shopping, tags: scurvy, t-shirts, Woot!Today I got another t-shirt from shirt.woot: “Say No To Scurvy”.
Author Archive
Sep
30
2008
My Anti-Scurvy ShirtPosted by: Steve Jamieson in Shopping, tags: scurvy, t-shirts, Woot!Today I got another t-shirt from shirt.woot: “Say No To Scurvy”.
Sep
29
2008
My Escher-esque ShirtPosted by: Steve Jamieson in Shopping, tags: M.C. Escher, office, t-shirts, Woot!Yesterday I wore my new shirt from shirt.woot: “M.C. Escher: Space Planner for Hire”. Cool, eh?
Sep
26
2008
Presidential SmackdownPosted by: Steve Jamieson in Politics, Rants, tags: debate, McCain, Obama, president, wrestlingTonight, prime-time broadcast TV was dominated by the presidential debate. The exception was the one channel that was running WWE Friday Night Smackdown. My question: Is there really any difference?
I’ll let you be the judge. How many times a day do you… 1. Brush your teeth? Twice 2. Shower? Once, occasionally twice (if I get dirty after the first). 3. Check your E-mail? Constantly. 4. Check At least twice, and probably too much! 5. Eat? 3 meals plus a snack or two. Some of you may recall that back in the Spring I was taking a class called “Technology & Assessment”—touted by the Mizzou course catalog as a class that would teach me about using technology to assess student learning. After taking “Library Use Instruction” the previous Fall and learning a little about assessment techniques, “Technology & Assessment” sounded like a good opportunity to learn more about a topic that is relevant to the part of my job that involves teaching students how to use the library. Unfortunately, Mizzou’s course catalog neglected to mention that the class was targeted specifically to K–12 teachers. It was rather frustrating to find out that little fact on the first day of class, but at least the professor was flexible and allowed me to tweak the assignments to fit my context. For the coming Fall semester I had signed up to take “Web Application Development I”, whose catalog description begins: “Learn to develop web applications to support online learning and collaboration using Perl, PHP, or Java (student’s choice)” (emphasis added). I’ve long been interested in learning PHP, so this seemed like a great opportunity to fulfill that goal and to get credit towards my degree doing it. However, on Friday the instructor sent out an email to the entire class:
Well that’s just dandy. No choice but ASP.NET. That torpedoes half of my Fall schedule, but for future planning I replied to the instructor asking when the PHP version of the course will be offered. He replied:
Wait… what? (A) Since they don’t have any firm plans to teach PHP in the near future, why is it listed in the course description at all? False advertising I say! (B) More importantly, how can you get away with teaching web application development without addressing PHP—one of the most widely used languages for web application development? I don’t care whether or not it’s fully object-oriented. If it’s good enough for Wikipedia, Wordpress, Facebook, et al., then it deserves our attention. |